Ioana Eva Cădariu ORCID iD Department of Psychology, Tibiscus University of Timisoara Romania
Ioana Eva Cădariu
Department of Psychology, Tibiscus University of Timisoara, Romania; Institute of Psychotherapy Psychological Counselling and Clinical Supervision, Timisoara, Romania.
cadariuioanaeva@yahoo.com,
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3258-9022
Loredana Vîșcu ORCID iD Tibiscus University of Timisoara, Romania Romania
Loredana Vîșcu
Department of Psychology, Tibiscus University of Timisoara, Romania; Institute of Psychotherapy Psychological Counselling and Clinical Supervision, Timisoara, Romania. loredana.viscu@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-9080
Cristian Delcea ORCID iD Iuliu Hatieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Romania
Cristian Delcea*
Department of Forensic Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj, Romania. cristian.delcea.cj@gmail.com,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-2898
Dana Rad ORCID iD Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad Romania
Dana Rad*
Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania. dana@xhouse.ro, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-3585
Ionut Virgil Serban ORCID iD University of Chieti-Pescara Italy
Ionut Virgil Serban*
University of Craiova, A. I. Cuza Str., No. 13, Craiova, 200585, Romania; fellow at the
University of Chieti-Pescara; and the University of International Studies in Rome (Unint), Italy.
ionut.serban@edu.ucv.ro, johnutzserban@yahoo.com,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-9989
Lidia Ricci ORCID iD Sapienza University of Rome, Rome Italy
Lidia Ricci
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Legal Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. lidia.ricci@uniroma1.it.
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7372-2127
Iacobina Carmen Zau
Institute of Sexology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Romania
Iacobina Carmen Zau*
Department of Research, Institute of Sexology,
Cluj-Napoca, Romania. cadariacobina@gmail.com
Ioana Eva Cădariu -
Department of Psychology, Tibiscus University of Timisoara (RO),
Loredana Vîșcu -
Tibiscus University of Timisoara, Romania (RO),
Cristian Delcea -
Iuliu Hatieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO),
Dana Rad -
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad (RO),
Ionut Virgil Serban -
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT),
Lidia Ricci -
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome (IT),
Iacobina Carmen Zau -
Institute of Sexology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (RO),
Abstract
The growing integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education requires educators to develop not only operational competencies but also confidence in using AI tools effectively. The present study examined the predictive relationship between the multidimensional construct of ChatGPT literacy and AI self-efficacy among educators working in Romanian educational settings. A sample of 393 educators from Western Romania completed the ChatGPT Literacy Scale (and the AI Self-Efficacy subscale of the Meta AI Literacy Scale. Reliability analyses indicated good to excellent internal consistency across all literacy dimensions (α = .80–.95) and AI self-efficacy (α = .89). To model nonlinear and hierarchical relationships among predictors, a Decision Tree Regression approach was implemented in JASP. The five ChatGPT literacy dimensions, technical proficiency, critical evaluation, communication proficiency, ethical competence, and creative application, were entered as predictors of AI self-efficacy. The model explained 53.2% of the variance in AI self-efficacy (R² = .532), demonstrating moderate predictive performance (MSE = 0.517; RMSE = 0.719). Feature importance analysis revealed that technical proficiency was the strongest predictor (40.07%), followed by ethical competence (18.12%), critical evaluation (14.99%), communication proficiency (14.01%), and creative application (12.80%). The first and most informative split occurred on technical proficiency, highlighting its importance in shaping educators’ perceived AI capability. These findings indicate that technical proficiency emerged as the strongest predictor of AI self-efficacy among educators. The results have implications for AI-focused professional development programmes, emphasising the importance of structured technical training alongside ethical and critical competencies.
Academic discipline and sub-disciplines:
Education