Teofil Panc ORCID iD Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest Romania
Teofil Panc
Faculty of Psychology & Faculty of Educational Sciences, Communication and International Relations, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania. teofil.panc@prof.utm.ro, http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9441-9007
Mușata Dacia Bocoș ORCID iD Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca Romania
Mușata-Dacia Bocoș
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. musata.bocos@ubbcluj.ro, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-7931
Cristian Manea ORCID iD Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest Romania
Cristian Manea
Faculty of Psychology & Faculty of Educational Sciences, Communication and International Relations, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania. cristian.manea@prof.utm.ro, http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3168-4378
Mihaela Neacșu ORCID iD National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest Romania
Mihaela Neacșu
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Social Sciences and Psychology, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
mihaela.neacsu0409@upb.ro, http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5762-7765
Mona Bădoi-Hammami ORCID iD Ovidius University of Constanta Romania
Mona Bădoi-Hammami
Teacher Training Department, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900527 Constanta, Romania. hammami.badoi@gmail.com, http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9566-5407
Zorica Triff
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca; Northern University Center of Baia Mare Romania
Zorica Triff
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Northern University Center of Baia Mare, Department of Specialization with Psychopedagogical Profile, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania. zorica.triff@dspp.utcluj.ro
Corina Colareza ORCID iD Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest Romania
Corina Colareza*
Faculty of Psychology & Faculty of Educational Sciences, Communication and International Relations, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania. alina.costache@prof.utm.ro; http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0749-6115
Gheorghe Mihai Bănariu ORCID iD Transilvania University of Brașov; Ovidius University of Constanta; Romanian ForensicScientist Association Romania
Gheorghe Mihai Bănariu*
Transilvania University of Brașov, Faculty of Medicine, Romania; Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania; Romanian ForensicScientist Association, Romania.
banariu.gheorghe@gmail.com, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-3205
Teofil Panc -
Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest (RO),
Mușata Dacia Bocoș -
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (RO),
Cristian Manea -
Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest (RO),
Mihaela Neacșu -
National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest (RO),
Mona Bădoi-Hammami -
Ovidius University of Constanta (RO),
Zorica Triff -
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca; Northern University Center of Baia Mare (RO),
Corina Colareza -
Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest (RO),
Gheorghe Mihai Bănariu -
Transilvania University of Brașov; Ovidius University of Constanta; Romanian ForensicScientist Association (RO),
Abstract
The present study investigates the relationship between selective attention and learning capacity in young adults, grounded in contemporary cognitive and neuropsychological models of information processing. Selective attention is conceptualised as a central executive mechanism responsible for filtering relevant stimuli and inhibiting interference (Broadbent, 1958; Desimone and Duncan, 1995; Petersen and Posner, 2012). Learning efficiency is conceptualised as dependent on attentional gating processes that regulate encoding and consolidation in working and long-term memory systems (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968; Baddeley, 2012; Kandel et al., 2014). Results indicate an exceptionally strong positive association between selective attention and verbal learning performance (r = .97, p < .001). Regression analyses suggest that selective attention accounts for a substantial proportion of variance in learning performance within the present sample. Differential analyses further indicate significant gender and residential environmental differences. These findings provide empirical support for theoretical assumptions regarding the central role of executive attention in facilitating encoding and consolidation processes (Engle, 2002; Miller and Cohen, 2001). Implications are discussed in relation to education, cognitive neuroscience, and cognitive performance optimisation.
Academic discipline and sub-disciplines:
Psychology; Neuroscience; Cognitive Sciences